Leaving a Gift to a Minor

Clients often want to leave a gift to a minor—a person who has not turned eighteen. Under Massachusetts law, a minor may not receive property or money from a personal representative or trustee. Fortunately, there is a manner for providing funds to minors under M.G.L. 201A, Uniform Transfers to Minors Act.

If a person wishes to name a minor in a will as a devisee or in a trust as a beneficiary, their attorney should carefully consider how this transfer will occur. The Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (often abbreviated as “UTMA”) allows the testator or settlor to name a custodian who shall hold the property on behalf of the minor until they turn eighteen. A testator or settlor may require the custodian to hold the property until the minor turns twenty-one. The will or trust should identify the proper custodian. See M.G.L. 201A §3. If the testator or settlor fails to nominate a custodian, the nominee dies prior to acceptance of the property, or the nominee refuses to serve, then the personal representative or trustee may nominate a a custodian. See M.G.L. 201A §5.

A “custodian shall: (1) take control of custodial property; (2) register or record title to custodial property if appropriate; and (3) collect, hold, manage, invest, and reinvest custodial property.” M.G.L. 201A §12(a). Further, “In dealing with custodial property, a custodian shall observe the standard of care that would be observed by a prudent person dealing with property of another and is not limited by any other statute restricting investments by fiduciaries. M.G.L. 201A §12(b).

Here are some examples:

John wants to include a gift of $10,000.00 in his will to his niece Mary. Mary is fourteen years old. John wants to be sure that Mary’s mother is custodian since Mary's parents are divorced and her father is not well suited to handle money. John may include the following language in his will: “I bequeath the sum of $10,000.00 to Joan Quitecontrary as custodian for Mary Quitecontrary under the Massachusetts Uniform Transfers to Minors Act.” If John simply named Mary in his will, his personal representative would be permitted to name a custodian at his or her discretion.

John wants to name Mary as beneficiary of his life insurance policy. On her designation of beneficiary form, John should include: “Joan Quitecontrary as custodian for Mary Quitecontrary under the Massachusetts Transfers to Minors Act.” In the absence of such a designation, Joan would need to provide the life insurance company with proof of guardianship. If Joan and her ex husband are unable to agree, a petition with the Probate and Family Court may be necessary to establish guardianship for purposes of establishing a custodian of the funds from the life insurance policy.

It is important to carefully consider any gift of beneficiary designation if it involves a transfer to a person who is not yet eighteen. For more information, contact attorney Benjamin Cote at (781) 319-1900.

Tangible Personal Property - The Forgotten Property

Many of my Clients focus on bank accounts, investment accounts, brokerage accounts and real estate. This is understandable. These types of assets generally represent the majority of the value of the Client’s estate.  Many Clients are surprised to learn, after a little discussion, that personal property is of significant importance in drafting their estate planning documents. Here are some of my observations:

Items to be devised to a particular person should be described as particularly as possible. When possible, detailed description, identification numbers, and like should be used. Most personal property that my Clients have devised is of significant sentimental value. It is less common that valuable artwork, precious metals, or other intrinsically valuable assets be mentioned. Furniture, jewelry, musical instruments, books and the like are often passed from one generation to the next.

There is a view by some Clients that items of high intrinsic value should not be identified in the will so as to avoid attracting the interest of an estate tax auditor. This should be considered in the context that any such item must be reported and appraised for tax reporting, regardless of the value of accounting for probate purposes. Furthermore, lack of clarity in the will as to intrinsically valuable property can lead to later disputes, particularly if it would otherwise be included in a residuary clause or a devise to a class of devisees.

Having provided representation to estates, I am consistently surprised by the amount of fighting that distributing personal property can cause. To a large extent, the personal property is of little economic value. Most of the fighting seems to arise from collateral issues and the grieving process in general. There should be a way to resolve such a dispute. For instance:

I give all of my household furniture, furnishing, and other tangible personal property to my children to be allocated among them as they agree. If they are unable to agree, my household furniture, furnishing, and other tangible personal property shall be distributed by my personal representative as she deems appropriate, including selection in order of choosing determined by lot or otherwise. I request that a reasonable effort be made to provide each child with an overall distribution off substantially equal value.

Alternatively, a Client may draft a separate memorandum which identifies which personal property is to be devised to whom. In the past, Massachusetts law did not allow for such a document—though non-binding language in the will requested that devisees divide the property as requested. Under the MUPC, a tangible personal property memorandum may be admitted to probate if it is signed by the testator and distributed with reasonable certainty. This can be done before or after the execution of a will, so long as the will accounts for it. This is a great option for those Clients who would be overwhelmed by the task of distributing personal property during the estate planning property or those Clients who are likely to change their minds.

Personal property is an often-forgotten type of property in estate planning. Clients are well advised to consider how, to whom, and what is distributed when their will is probated.

Stiles Law, with offices located in Boston and Marshfield, Massachusetts, offers estate planning services including wills, trusts, powers of attorney, guardianship nominations, and more. Stiles Law serves all areas of eastern Massachusetts–the North Shore, Boston, and Cape Cod, in addition to the entire South Shore, including: Plymouth, Kingston, Duxbury, Hanover, Pembroke, Marshfield, Scituate, Norwell, Cohasset, Hull, Hingham, Weymouth, Braintree, Milton, Quincy, Dorchester, Charlestown, Brookline, Dedham, Canton, Rockland, and everywhere in between..

Copyright © 2018 Stiles Law, All rights reserved. Stiles Law is a Massachusetts licensed law firm and all content is based on Massachusetts law. The information presented above is meant to be used for general informational purposes and it should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts. 

Wills Executed in Contemplation of Marriage

The Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code (“MUPC”) became effective in March of 2012. The MUPC modernized the probate code and estate administration in Massachusetts. Under the MUPC, marriage does not revoke a prior will. If there is a marriage after the will is executed, the surviving spouse is entitled to take their intestate share. The spouse’s intestate share is the entire estate less the share of children who are not children of the surviving spouse and were born before the testator married the surviving spouse. The rationale behind this rule is clear: 1) the surviving spouse should receive a portion of the estate as most married couples intend that their spouse receive the benefit of their separately held property, while balanced against 2) the interests of pre-born children who are not born of this marriage. Imagine the following scenario:

Tim Testator and Sally Survivor are married in 2012. Tim executed a will in 2010, a year before he met Sally. Tim has three adult children from a prior marriage in 1982. Tim dies in 2013. Sally submits Tim’s will to the probate court. Even though Sally isn’t named in the will, she is entitled to one half (1/2) of Tim’s estate. His three adult children are entitled to the other half, in equal one third (1/3) shares. Sally is protected against extreme divesture and Tim’s children is protected against a subsequent spouse taking the entire estate and making no provision for them in the future.

Let’s change the facts slightly. If the three children are also children of Sally, regardless of whether they are born before the date of their marriage, Sally will take the entire estate—her intestate share.

What if the Client wants his spouse to take the entire estate. The terms a will supersede the laws of intestacy. The Client should execute a new will. If the Client wishes for his children or other devisees to take regardless of a subsequent marriage, language to the effect of “This will shall be effective notwithstanding any subsequent marriage.” As with most other estate planning matters. This is highly fact dependent and careful consideration should be given during the consultation.

Stiles Law, with offices located in Boston and Marshfield, Massachusetts, offers estate planning services including wills, trusts, powers of attorney, guardianship nominations, and more. Stiles Law serves all areas of eastern Massachusetts–the North Shore, Boston, and Cape Cod, in addition to the entire South Shore, including: Plymouth, Kingston, Duxbury, Hanover, Pembroke, Marshfield, Scituate, Norwell, Cohasset, Hull, Hingham, Weymouth, Braintree, Milton, Quincy, Dorchester, Charlestown, Brookline, Dedham, Canton, Rockland, and everywhere in between..

Copyright © 2018 Stiles Law, All rights reserved. Stiles Law is a Massachusetts licensed law firm and all content is based on Massachusetts law. The information presented above is meant to be used for general informational purposes and it should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts. 

What is a Bond and Sureties?

Every personal representative must file a bond with the Probate Court. The Bond is a form that states that the personal representative shall be personally liable for the amount stated on the bond which represents the estimated amount of the value of the decedent’s real and personal estate.

A surety is a written agreement by a bond company which, in exchange for an annual premium, covers damage or loss to the estate caused by the personal representative’s actions. In effect, it is an insurance policy for the personal representative’s breach of his or her duties. The decedent’s will may waive sureties. For example, the will may state:

I request that any personal representative nominated in this will be exempt for furnishing a bond, or if a bond is required, from furnishing sureties thereon.

It is important to note that the interested persons in the estate must assent to the waiver of sureties on the bond. It should be noted that the language above only waives sureties for the nominated personal representatives – if they are unable or unwilling to serve, an alternate or any administrator appointed by the court would still need to provide sureties on their bond.

Why is this important? Most of my clients do not give this topic much thought when they execute their wills. Many of my clients who petition to become a personal representative are surprised to learn that they are personally liable. Understanding this concept at the point of drafting a will allows the Client to decide whether sureties are necessary. In many cases, they simply are not.

Stiles Law, with offices located in Boston and Marshfield, Massachusetts, offers estate planning services including wills, trusts, powers of attorney, guardianship nominations, and more. Stiles Law serves all areas of eastern Massachusetts–the North Shore, Boston, and Cape Cod, in addition to the entire South Shore, including: Plymouth, Kingston, Duxbury, Hanover, Pembroke, Marshfield, Scituate, Norwell, Cohasset, Hull, Hingham, Weymouth, Braintree, Milton, Quincy, Dorchester, Charlestown, Brookline, Dedham, Canton, Rockland, and everywhere in between..

Copyright © 2018 Stiles Law, All rights reserved. Stiles Law is a Massachusetts licensed law firm and all content is based on Massachusetts law. The information presented above is meant to be used for general informational purposes and it should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts. 

The Reason You Probably Don't Have an Estate Plan May Surprise You

Chances are, if you do not have an estate plan it is because you are having trouble deciding who should care for your minor children. You can never replace yourself as a parent, but doing nothing leaves your children open to a Probate Court Guardianship battle.

If you want to learn more and schedule your no-obligation consultation, please enter your information below:

Learn More and Schedule a No-Obligation Consultation

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit

Stiles Law, with offices located in Boston and Marshfield, Massachusetts, offers estate planning services including wills, trusts, powers of attorney, guardianship nominations, and more. Stiles Law serves all areas of eastern Massachusetts–the North Shore, Boston, and Cape Cod, in addition to the entire South Shore, including: Plymouth, Kingston, Duxbury, Hanover, Pembroke, Marshfield, Scituate, Norwell, Cohasset, Hull, Hingham, Weymouth, Braintree, Milton, Quincy, Dorchester, Charlestown, Brookline, Dedham, Canton, Rockland, and everywhere in between..

Copyright © 2018 Stiles Law, All rights reserved. Stiles Law is a Massachusetts licensed law firm and all content is based on Massachusetts law. The information presented above is meant to be used for general informational purposes and it should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts.